完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | 林賢治 | |
| dc.contributor.other | Hsien-Chih Lin | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-08-25T06:50:58Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2020-08-25T06:50:58Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2012/09/19 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1682-587N | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dspace.fcu.edu.tw/handle/2376/2366 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本文首先簡短地回顧西方有關人類平等問題的探討，並指出孫中山與馬克思的平等思想受西方十七、十八世紀古典自然法學派平等思想的影響，且對古典自然法學派的平等思想提出有力的批評，從而發展出一家之言的平等理論。_x000D_ 關於孫中山的平等理論，作者從「不平等與假平等」、「平等的真諦──真平等」等二個方面論說孫中山的平等理論，並認為孫中山的平等理論是一個創新的平等理論。其次，再從「對資產階級平等的批判」、「平等思想與工人階級運動」和「共產主義社會有平等思想嗎？」等三個方面來探究馬克思的平等思想，從而結論指出，馬克思所構思的共產主義社會，是不需要平等思想的。最後，以「關於平等理論的哲學基礎」、「關於平等理論的目標」、「關於平等的需求」和「關於平等理論的思想地位」等四個主題來比較研究孫中山與馬克思的平等理論。_x000D_ 由前述的論說和比較，作者在結論裡強調，孫中山的平等思想是具體的、踏實的，其目的是要建立一個新國家。相反的，馬克思的平等思想主要在批判任何形式的平等思想，並擬想一個不需要任何形式平等思想的共產主義社會。 | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | 逢甲大學 | |
| dc.format.extent | 20 | |
| dc.language.iso | 中文 | |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | 逢甲人文社會學報 | |
| dc.relation.isversionof | 第二期 | |
| dc.subject | 天生的不平等 | |
| dc.subject | 人為的不平等 | |
| dc.subject | 資產階級法權 | |
| dc.subject | 無產階級專政 | |
| dc.subject | 各盡所能，各取所需 | |
| dc.subject.other | inequality of nature | |
| dc.subject.other | inequality of man－made | |
| dc.subject.other | right of the bourgeoisie | |
| dc.subject.other | dictatorship of the proletariat | |
| dc.subject.other | everyone doing his best , everyone taking his needs | |
| dc.title | 孫中山與馬克思平等理論之比較研究 | |
| dc.title.alternative | The Comparative Study of Theory of Equality Between Sun Yat-Sen and Karl Marx | |
| dc.type | 期刊篇目 | |
| dc.description.translationabstract | Firstly, this paper states the western theories of human equality briefly, and points out that the thoughts of equality of Sun Yat-Sen and Karl Marx had been influenced by the thoughts of equality of classical natural law in the seventeenth and_x000D_ eighteenth centuries, and had developed their own theory of equality finally. Concerning the theory of equality of Sun Yat-Sen , the author explores it from two aspects of “ Inequality and False Equality ” and “ True Meaning of Equality──_x000D_ Real Equality ” , and argues that Sun Yat-Sen’s theory of equality is a new theory of equality . Secondly, the author explores Marx’s theory of equality from three aspects of “ Criticism of Bourgeois Equality ”, “ Thought of Equality and Movement of Working Class ”, and “ Is There the Theory of Equality in Communist Society ？”,_x000D_ and conclusively points out that thought of equality is unnecessary for communist_x000D_ society visualized by Marx. Lastly, the author compares two theories of equality from four topics of “ Philosophical Foundation of Theory of Equality ”, “ Goal of Theory of Equality ”, “ Necessity of Equality ” and “ Theory of Equality in Thought System ” . According to the discussion and comparison mentioned above, in conclusion, the_x000D_ author emphasizes that Sun Yat-Sen’s theory of equality is concrete and practical, and it’s aim is to build a new country .On the contrary, the aim of Marx’s theory of equality is to criticize the thought of equality in any form, and to visualize a communist society for which the thought of equality in any form is unnecessary. | |
| 分類: | 第02期 | |
在 DSpace 系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。