完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.author詹杭倫
dc.contributor.otherHang-Lun Zhan
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-25T06:57:05Z-
dc.date.available2020-08-25T06:57:05Z-
dc.date.issued2012/10/17
dc.identifier.issn1682-587N
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.fcu.edu.tw/handle/2376/2412-
dc.description.abstract這篇論文旨在討論宋代賦學研究中兩個問題:一是有關宋代文賦的評價存在著古今評價不同的差異,有必要加以辨析;二是宋代辭賦文體分類存在著相當混亂的情況,有必要加以釐清。_x000D_ 本文試圖解釋造成宋代文賦古今差異的原因,並且把宋代辭賦重新歸爲四類,以便爲宋代辭賦研究奠定辨體的基礎。
dc.description.sponsorship逢甲大學
dc.format.extent18
dc.language.iso中文
dc.relation.ispartofseries逢甲人文社會學報
dc.relation.isversionof第七期
dc.subject宋代文學
dc.subject辭賦
dc.subject文賦
dc.subject體裁
dc.subject.otherLiterature of Song dynasty
dc.subject.otherCi-Fu
dc.subject.otherWen-Fu
dc.subject.otherTypes of literature
dc.title宋代辭賦辨體論
dc.title.alternativeOn the Types of Ci-Fu Literature in the S’ong Dynasty
dc.type期刊篇目
dc.description.translationabstractThere are two primary questions about S’ong dynasty Ci-Fu literature: One of _x000D_ the questions is whether S’ong dynasty Wen-Fu was appraised differently by ancient and modern scholars. Another question is whether the types of S’ong dynasty Ci-Fu literature were sorted with clarity. This article attempts to explain the reason why S’ong dynasty Wen-Fu was appraised differently by ancient and modern scholars as _x000D_ well as to divide S’ong dynasty Ci-Fu into four types of literature. The purpose is to establish a foundation for studying S’ong dynasty Ci-Fu.
分類:第07期

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
30215.pdf603.22 kBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟


在 DSpace 系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。