完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | 洪文雄 | |
| dc.contributor.other | Wen-Hsiung Hung | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-08-25T07:08:50Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2020-08-25T07:08:50Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2012/10/31 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1682-587N | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dspace.fcu.edu.tw/handle/2376/2542 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 唐人孫過庭以草書撰寫的〈書譜〉，是中國書法史上影響廣遠的劇跡，其書跡為王羲之嫡嗣；其理論宏富，開先啟後，因此歷代研究者不乏其人，本文檢閱中國歷代對〈書譜〉的記載，以明歷代對〈書譜〉的評價與詮釋。研究結果指出：唐代時，孫過庭雖然受到書論家的批評但是仍有廣泛影響；宋朝時，漸受真賞，先有米芾之推重，後有南宋幾位皇帝的臨習，取得崇高的地位；元朝時一度受到譏評，到了明初，時代相隔拉遠，又重獲重視，但仍有微詞；到了清朝，〈書譜〉已成為學習王羲之書法不能繞過的經典，並且有更多的註解與詮釋。又整體而言，〈書譜〉的理論先有穩固的地位，而其書跡在唐朝時只位居能品，後來逐漸受到重視，因為它深得右軍筆法且以真跡的面貌流傳至今，遂成為至寶。 | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | 逢甲大學 | |
| dc.format.extent | 43 | |
| dc.language.iso | 中文 | |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | 逢甲人文社會學報 | |
| dc.relation.isversionof | 第二十期 | |
| dc.subject | 書法 | |
| dc.subject | 孫過庭 | |
| dc.subject | 孫虔禮 | |
| dc.subject | 書譜 | |
| dc.subject.other | Calligraphy | |
| dc.subject.other | Sun Guoting | |
| dc.subject.other | Sun Qianli | |
| dc.subject.other | Treatise on Calligraphy | |
| dc.title | 論中國歷代對孫過庭〈書譜〉的評價與詮釋 | |
| dc.title.alternative | The Appraisal and Annotation on Sun Guoting's Treatise on Calligraphy in Chinese History | |
| dc.type | 期刊篇目 | |
| dc.description.translationabstract | Sun Guoting (traditional Chinese: 孫過庭), a Chinese calligrapher of the early Tang Dynasty, was remembered for his cursive calligraphy and his Treatise on Calligraphy (書譜) . The work was the first important and influential script of_x000D_ Chinese calligraphy, and it was much more significant because his writing script could be traced to Wang Xizhi. The theory in this work has broken new ground ever since; therefore, many researchers have been studying it. This article tried to do a survey about the appraisal and annotation on Treatise on Calligraphy in Chinese_x000D_ history in order to understand its value. The results in this research are the following._x000D_ Sun Guoting was criticized in Tang Dynasty but still had far-reaching influence._x000D_ During the Song Dynasty, Sun won high appraisal gradually, including Mi-Fu’s appreciation first and some emperors’ imitation writing later in Southern Song Dynasty. Sun was also ridiculed and criticized in Yuan Dynasty, but in the beginning of Ming Dynasty, because it was difficult to get Wang Xizhi’s true scripts, Sun won his appraisal and reputation again in spite of some criticisms. During Chin Dynasty, Treatise on Calligraphy became a powerful classic that learners of Wang_x000D_ Xizhi’s calligraphy could not do without. Also, there were more attention and annotation about Sun’s work in this period. Generally speaking, the theory in Treatise on Calligraphy has won its firm and high position. Though it was only put in_x000D_ a minor position in Tang Dynasty, it has been highly appreciated. Because Sun’s scripts have survived until now, they are treated as art treasures. | |
| 分類: | 第20期 | |
在 DSpace 系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。