完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.author楊志誠
dc.contributor.otherChih-Cheng Yang
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-25T07:11:35Z-
dc.date.available2020-08-25T07:11:35Z-
dc.date.issued2011/06/01
dc.identifier.issn1682-587N
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.fcu.edu.tw/handle/2376/2601-
dc.description.abstract從西方的眼光來看,普遍認為中國的工業化已經有了相當大的成果,但是一 般也感覺到,如果從社會文化的層面來看,中國現代化的文化轉型似乎還未臻完 成。另一方面,自上世紀末以來,以文化為主流價值的「軟權力」在國際社會正 受到關注,不管是在經濟領域、政治領域或社會領域的競逐,各主要國家都試圖 建構具有世界影響力的文化網絡,尤其在一個具有「蝴蝶效應」的全球化體系中, 彼此處於相互影響的生存競爭狀態;影響他者或接受他者影響,將成為無可逃避 的選擇。 本文也認為中國在工業力、經濟力及政治力的成長已有非凡的成就,但國家 現代化的文化轉型尚未完成。值此時刻,中國也以負責任的大國身分提出了「中 國夢」的國家發展構想,包括「亞投行」、「一帶一路」…等的「和平發展」路線。 在全球化體系知識文明的典範下,既要發展,又要和平,那就需要建構「具世界 影響力的文化網絡」。而如果要完成如此宏大的願景,國家政策的規畫顯然是必 要的途徑;這也是本文的研究主旨。 本文將根據政策學的理論探討下列三大問題: 一、中國的文化轉型已經歷了一個半世紀,體驗了文化議題的討論、爭議和 碰撞,為何至今還未能真正完成? 二、西方工業文明的文化模式已經顯現嚴重的異化,西方知識份子都已重新 反省和批判,正在另尋出路,中國還要繼續走下去嗎?如果我們也體驗了這種異 化現象,那麼未來的文化轉型應該選擇哪一種文化模式呢? 三、從文化的面向來看,未來中國夢應如何實現?本論文將運用政策學的架構,分析主客觀形勢及條件,針對上述問題,提出 概念性的回應。
dc.description.sponsorship逢甲大學
dc.relation.ispartofseries逢甲人文社會學報
dc.relation.isversionof第三十一期
dc.subject文化轉型
dc.subject知識文明
dc.subject量子思維
dc.subject超穩定結構
dc.subject結構斷層
dc.subject.otherCultural transformation
dc.subject.otherKnowledge civilization
dc.subject.otherUltra-stable structure
dc.subject.otherStructural fracture
dc.title中華文化復興的政策思維:實現中國夢的途徑
dc.title.alternativePolicy Orientation of Chinese Cultural Revival: A Pathway to the Realization of the Chinese Dream
dc.type期刊篇目
dc.description.translationabstractIt is generally believed that the industrialization in China has a very huge success. However, in terms of a socio-cultural aspect, it seems that the modernization of Chinese cultural transformation has not achieved its goal yet. Meanwhile, the notion of “soft power” that bases its main value on culture has received many attentions in international society. Every major nation is trying to construct a cultural network that is influential worldwide, especially in a globalized system that can lead to “butterfly effects”. To influence others or to be influenced by others has become a necessary choice. This paper also maintains that China has marvelous achievement in industrial, economical, and political power, but has not yet completed its cultural transformation in terms of modernization. At this moment, China also proposes “the Chinese dream” as a responsible great power, including “Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank” and “One Belt And One Road” that are described as “the path of peaceful development.” Under the paradigm of “knowledge civilization”, if China seeks development as well as peace, it must construct “a cultural network that is influential worldwide.” And to complete such a grand vision, a plan of national policy is apparently a necessary path. The paper will deal with the following questions based on policy studies: 1. Cultural transformation in China has been in place for one and a half century. Why hasn’t this process completed? 2. The cultural mode of Western industrial civilization has shown severe alienation, and Western intellectuals have reflected upon and criticized this phenomenon, attempting to find another route. Should China follow this mode? If China also experiences this alienation, what kinds of cultural mode should cultural transformation in the future be? 3. From the perspective of culture, how should the Chinese dream realize itself in the future? Besides, this paper will exploit policy studies to provide a conceptual framework in response to the questions mentioned above.
分類:第31期

文件中的檔案:
沒有與此文件相關的檔案。


在 DSpace 系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。